I've been pondering some thoughts today, so this will be long!
It started with a discussion in another forum about CIO (cryinig it out) with a baby to get him to sleep. The mother had heard that CIO meant that the child eventually comes to the realization that no matter WHAT they do or HOW hard they cry, no one will come to them. And she didn't want her baby to think that, so she's not CIO. But she resents having to rock the baby to sleep for a length of time, and often again during the night.
One of the responses (of course they dismissed the idea of the child giving up on help coming his way...) from another mother was that her children (NOT CIO) don't nap well, wake often at night, and often wake up unhappy. But not so with her CIO friend, whose children nap for 2 hours, sleep all night, and wake up smiling and talking.
I have found this to be true for me, as well...I co-sleep and nurse on demand, throughout the night, and my kids have never napped well.
Which got me to thinking about WHY I do what I do, from Home birthing to Unschooling....
I don't necessarily think that our kids will turn out BETTER because of the decisions I'm making. In other words, I've seen healthy formula fed babies (I was one!) and my babies, all exclusively breast-fed, still got sick and an occasional ear infection. Not all co-sleepers are confident and my kids still get more diaper rashes when they wear cloth....
So WHY do I do what I'm doing? Do I unschool because I believe my kids will be more successful? Smarter? Happier?
Sometimes homeschoolers will wave the facts about inventors and geniuses who were homeschooled...as if every child who learns at home will turn the world upside down...
When I first became a parent, I wanted to give my child the best of EVERYTHING, knowing I technically couldn't. I can't afford all organic food. We can't afford the "perfect" house, if one can even determine WHAT makes a perfect living space...And I had no idea how to determine what success in life actually meant. I knew it wasn't having money. Or a house. Or STUFF. Or even education. And yet, there must be SOMETHING I could do to make my child happy.
And so I did what came naturally to ME. I trusted my child to know what she needed, and I gave it to her to the best of my ability as long as it wasn't harmful to her or anyone else.
I think that even if I had formula fed her, she would still be the child she is today. I think that even if I had birthed her in a hospital, she would still be the child she is today. I think that even if she slept in a crib, and I HAD let her cry, that she would most likely still be the child she is today. Because *I* am her parent. Because *I* am still who *I* am, she would still be who she is because I'm the one raising her.
And here's where the philosophy comes full circle, if you can follow my strange thought pattern:
But it's BECAUSE I am who I am that she WAS birthed at home, nursed, and slept beside me. It's BECAUSE I'm her mother that she will be unschooled. It's because *I'm* the one parenting her that she will turn out to be who she is...
Now, I'm not saying that she doesn't have her own personality and all that...what I'm saying is that it dawned on me that those of us who unschool, or homeschool, or any kind of school don't have a monopoly on the brightest, happiest kids. And most parents love their children just as much as we do. There are public school kids who are well-adjusted and turn out as good as can be. And I bet there are some great parents behind them. And of course there's always the exception with the bad parents and kid who overcame, just as there's the vice versa.
But in the end, the reason we choose to unshcool may have less to do with wanting our kids to succeed, than to do with OUR desire to be the BEST parents WE can be, and finding that we can do no less than completely trust our child to know what's best for themselves.
I really DO wish my child slept through the night, took 2 hour naps, and woke up happy EVERY time. But the only way I KNOW of insuring this (short of having a naturally happy-go-lucky baby instead of the high-needs ones I did!) would be to let them cry until they give up hope.
And this is something I simply CAN NOT do. Not because I think my kid will be haunted by it forever. Most kids who CIO seem fine. You couldn't find them in a crowd and pick them out against the kids who co-sleep. But it's because every fiber in my being will NOT let me listen to my child cry for me and not respond. It's because my instinct demands I affirm his need for me.
And for this reason, I choose to unschool. My kids MAY not be the most intelligent, they may not be the most versatile, they may not be the best ANYTHING.
But they WILL be what THEY want to be, whatever it is. And they will know, beyond ANY shadow of a doubt, that I am ALWAYS there for them and will cheer them on to ANYTHING they should strive for....
And today, as I needed to get away from my kids for JUST a half hour walk by myself....Today, as the twins (14 months) kept climbing on me and crying for goodness knows why (teething? growing pains? just toddler angst?)....Today, when I actually get jealous of the moms who CIO or the parents who send their kids to school for the free time they get in return...
Today I reaffirmed MY reason for taking the road less traveled...
Deb